Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Reactions To The Justin Maxwell For Kyle Smith Trade

Dave Cameron thinks it was an odd move for the Royals, who likely won't make the playoffs:
However, to get Maxwell, the Royals gave up Kyle Smith, who Marc Hulet rated as their #10 prospect heading into the season. Smith has been excellent in high-A Wilmington this year, and is probably not far away from being ready for Double-A. He’s undersized, but the stuff and the results are there, and the Astros are clearly not shy about taking chances on short dudes who can play.
Smith isn’t any kind of elite prospect and might turn out to be nothing in the long run, but this seems like another example of the Royals paying an above market cost for a useful player that won’t actually help them enough for his presence to matter much. With or without Maxwell, the Royals aren’t going to the postseason this year, so at best, he pushes them a little closer to .500. Meanwhile, similar players are going to be outrighted off 40-man rosters this winter, and so while Maxwell is under team control for several more years, the future value he will provide could have been replicated without actually giving up a prospect at the deadline.
It’s not a backbreaker, and perhaps Maxwell will turn into more of a regular contributor than the short half of a job share, but this still seems like a bit of an odd maneuver for the Royals. This is the kind of trade that a contender makes to get their roster ready for postseason play. The Royals would like to be the team making those kinds of moves, but making those kinds of moves doesn’t make you a contender.

John Sickels loves the deal for Houston:
My initial take on this was that the Astros got a great return for Maxwell, but I like Smith more than most analysts do. I've seen him called a Grade C prospect by other reputable sources, and that's apparently the same way that the Royals viewed him. You don't swap a top pitching prospect for a 29-year-old outfielder with a career .222 average and a history of injury.
It is also true that pitchers with Smith's profile often fail to carry forward at the highest levels, so from the Royals point-of-view, they were trading a fungible middling prospect for a guy who can help in the outfield next year. To top it off, I actually like Justin Maxwell and it wouldn't surprise me to see him be a (really) late bloomer. However, it would seem to me that a guy like Maxwell should be acquirable without having to give up a prospect like Smith,who has performed well at a young age.

Royal Revival thinks that Maxwell's platoon splits will make him useful piece in Kansas City's outfield mix:
This seems like a pretty good divide. Again this exercise was purely to get a feel for how the playing time could be divided up. Obviously, if the Royals don't play Gordon everyday there could be more playing time for others. This might even help to optimize the offense. I just don't expect Gordon's playing time to dip due to this acquisition and that's probably a good thing. My biggest takeaway is that we all have automatically assumed that Lough is the obvious choice to see a dip in playing time, but this might not be the best case scenario.

Reactions to the Bud Norris to Baltimore Trade

Enos Sarris of Fangraphs thinks it was an exchange of flawed pieces:
The only mitigating factor is that the cost wasn’t high. LJ Hoes was the fith-best prospect on Marc Hulet’s Orioles list going into the season, but he’s played in the corner outfield this year, and since he doesn’t have any power, and even his work on the basepaths is problematic, he just doesn’t fit the plate profile to be a major league right fielder. So he’s on the move again.
The Astros will also get a second prospect — Josh Hader has been discussed, but his medicals may or may not require a substitution — and that can always change things, and the value of the pick they receive is also hard to suss out completely, but continues the asset collection plan that Jeff Luhnow and his team have had in place.

John Sickels breaks down the prospects headed to Houston:
Hader is listed at 6-3, 160, but has gained size and strength since signing, boosting his fastball from 84-87 in high school to 88-94 in pro ball. His changeup is ahead of his slider and curveball at this point, but he's deceptive and he's made a huge amount of progress in the last 13 months. He still needs to sharpen up his command, but he's got a shot at being a mid-rotation starter if he refines his breaking pitches and control.. Even if that doesn't work out, his ability to cross-up lefties could be useful in the pen; he's held them to a .138 average this year...
Like Hader, Hoes was a local kid for the Orioles, drafted in the third round in 2008 from high school in Washington, DC. He's made slow but steady progress through the farm system, reaching Triple-A and the majors briefly last year and again this year. In 2012 he hit .300/.374/.397 for Norfolk; this year he's at .304/.406/.403. He is 0-for-4 in three major league contests.
The Orioles' acquisition of Bud Norris gives them needed starting pitching depth, especially with Jason Hammel going on the DL on Wednesday, but also could help bolster their right-handed relief corps, if everyone comes back healthy and available. The Astros get a 4A position player, who gets on base, and a lottery-ticket lefty with arm strength but a long ways to go.

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Additional Reactions To The Veras-Vasquez Deal

As we wait on Bud Norris to be moved, here are more reactions to the Veras-Vasquez deal.

Jonah Keri broke down the deal for Grantland:
In return, the Astros picked up 19-year-old Danry Vasquez, an outfielder playing in the Midwest League and a player to be named later. The Venezuelan left fielder was the Tigers' sixth-ranked prospect coming into this season according to Baseball America. But he's hitting a modest .281/.333/.390 this year, and there are questions about his power, especially if he hopes to play a power position like corner outfield at higher levels. He's a nice lottery ticket for the Astros to get in exchange for a scrap-heap pickup like Veras, but not someone the Tigers figure to miss, one way or another. (Oh, and Jose Cisnero is probably your guy for saves in Houston, if you actually are a fantasy player.)
Grant Brisbee thought the Astros executed a perfect flip of Veras:
They did make one move, though, and that was to sign Veras to a one-year, $2 million deal. It seemed odd, spending that much for a reliever who was okay, at best. That was their big move of the offseason.
That move turned out to be a perfectly executed play in the Bad Team Playbook... 
The Astros didn't spend a lot of money in the offseason, but when they did, it was to find a closer-in-waiting who could help them in the future. That's a pretty nifty trick, and the successful reliever-to-closer transmutation was straight out of the Bad Team Playbook. It rarely works that well.

Embrace The Risk: Analyzing The Jose Veras For Danryn Vasquez Trade

The Astros announced yesterday that they traded closer Jose Veras for OF prospect Danry Vasquez and a PTBNL.  It's a deal that fits the needs and present situations of both clubs. 

Veras Shores Up A Weakness For Detroit

The Tigers get a potential late-inning relief option to mix and match with Benoit and Smyly.  Even if Veras doesn't represent a upgrade over their current closer, he should be able to replace high-leverage innings being pitched by relievers lower in the totem pole.  They also got to upgrade their bullpen without giving up top prospects, Nick Castellanos or Avisail Garcia.  There were rumors that one of those prospects might be shipped out for a "Proven Closer."  That would have been ridiculous.  As we'll get into later, Vasquez is a good prospect, but he's in low-A, comes with a lot of risk, and plays a position where Detroit is relatively well-stocked in the minors.  In a decade, Vasquez could make this deal look awful for them--but most likely he doesn't make them live regret it.  Detroit is a playoff team in the middle of their window for contention with a 84 year old owner.  It makes sense for them to address their most glaring need, particularly by sending off a high risk prospect who is far way from the majors.

Risk Cuts Both Ways For The Astros

For the Astros, risk is a good thing.  If Vasquez was a sure-thing can't-miss prospect, he wouldn't be available for Jose Veras.  The Astros were able to pick Veras off of the dust bin, clean him up, and trade him in for something that better fits their situation.  Vasquez isn't a sure thing, but he's a high variance prospect who has the potential to be 1st division corner outfield. The Astros were smart to embrace that kind of risk.

Veras was non-tendered by the Brewers over the offseason and was picked up by the Astros on a $2 million dollar one-year deal with a team option.  He turned out to be a productive pitcher, but was being wasted on a team that is at least a year and a half away from contending.  So after essentially showcasing Veras for half a season, they flipped him for Vasquez and a PTBNL, who at least have chances to contribute to the next Astros playoff run.

It was a masterful stroke by Luhnow and kind of move that can speed up the rebuilding process.  It also shows how teams can creatively add prospects to their system.  With the new CBA, teams' hands are tied in regarding to how much they can allocate to amateur acquisitions.  Just a few years ago,  if the Astros wanted to cut major league playroll and commit it all to the draft and international free agency, there was no rule stopping them.  They could have theoretically signed every high school draft prospect that fell due to signability.   Teams are now regulated by MLB on how much they can spend in amateur acquisitions, but by picking up players out of free agency, showcasing them, and then selling them for prospects, a rebuilding team can add to their system through a non-traditional way.

Vasquez has tools, pedigree, and fits an area of need in the Astros organization.  Outside of Domingo Santana and, perhaps, Robbie Grossman, there aren't many corner outfielders in the system that are true prospects.

He also has a chance--even if it is a small one--to be a middle-of-the-order hitter.  Of course, there are countless tooled up prospects that never make it.  The hope I have is that unlike the Telvin Nashs, Bobby Borcherings, and Ariel Ovandos of the world, Vasquez has shown an outstanding contact rate throughout his brief career.  Currently his strikeout per PA rate is 13.3% at low-A as a 19 year old.  What good is an ability to hit the ball 500 feet if you can't make contact with it?  Vasquez hasn't shown the ability hit the ball 500 feet, but I suspect the chance that he develops power as he enters his 20s is greater than the chance some prospect who strikes out 30% of the time learns how to make contact.

Of course, according to scouting reports, Vasquez is below-average fielder, a below-average runner, and is probably stuck in LF.  If true, that's going to put a lot of pressure on his bat.  But, even with a high risk that Vasquez never pans out, he also has a higher chance than Veras of helping the next winning Astros club.

Scouting Reports and Rankings: Danry Vasquez

YearAgeTmLevPAABH2B3BHRRBISBBBSOBAOBPSLGOPS
201117TigersRk22420656812303734.272.306.350.655
2012182 TeamsA--A42238810619234262065.273.308.356.664
201218ConnecticutA-3102899016223561345.311.341.401.742
201218West MichiganA112991630170720.162.218.222.440
201319West MichiganA42037410516553993156.281.333.390.723
3 Seasons1066968267438101111858155.276.317.368.685
A (2 seasons)A53247312119564693876.256.308.355.664
Rk (1 season)Rk22420656812303734.272.306.350.655
A- (1 season)A-3102899016223561345.311.341.401.742
Generated 7/29/2013.
 
 
 
MLB.com's Jonathan Mayo currently ranks Vasquez as the 4th best prospect in the Tiger's system:
 
Scouting Grades* (present/future):Hit: 3/6 | Power: 3/5 | Run: 4/4 | Arm: 4/5 | Field: 4/5 | Overall: 3/5
The Tigers pushed Vasquez to full-season ball aggressively to start the 2012 season, but the Venezuelan outfielder wasn't ready. To his credit, when he was demoted to the New York-Penn League, he produced, finishing seventh in the short-season circuit in batting average. Vasquez is still very raw, but has the chance to keep hitting .300 as he moves up the ladder. He may never have a huge power profile, but he could be the type of hitter who runs into 12-15 homers annually. He's played both outfield corners thus far, but seems to be settling into left field. It's his bat that will move him up the ladder and he's still exceptionally young, playing the entire 2013 season at age 19.
 
 
Vasquez ranked #8 in the Tiger's system by Fangraph's Mark Hulet:
 
Soon to 19, Vasquez began 2012 in A-ball but hit just .162 in 29 games before being sent back down to short-season ball. The outfielder responded well to hit .311 in 72 games but with below-average power for a 6’3” hitter.
The left-handed hitter struggles mightily against southpaws (.197 vs .345 batting average splits) and needs to improve his pitch recognition but he makes decent contact. With an improved approach, he could develop at least average power. A contact I spoke with said Vasquez just needs to learn himself and what it takes to prepare day in and day out, as well as how to compete at a professional level.
“He’s such a young kid and a raw, potential star. Professional baseball is a whole different world – especially for a Latin young man,” he said. “He’s an exciting guy to watch… and you get excited about what he could become.” Vasquez will get another shot at full-season A-ball in 2013 but will likely spend the entire year at that level. He’s probably at least four years from reaching the majors.
Baseball America had Vasquez as the Detroit's 6th best prospect entering the year:
The Tigers had scouted Vasquez in Venezuela since he was 14, so they felt comfortable signing him for $1.2 million when he turned 16 in 2010. A tall, lean, lefthanded batter, he shows excellent control of the barrel, which is evident in his low strikeout rate (13 percent of plate appearances) and .281 average this season at West Michigan. Vasquez doesn’t hit for much power at this stage, and he may need to add mass to his frame and loft to his line-drive swing to meet the home run standard required for everyday work in left field. He grades out as below-average in the speed, range and arm strength departments, so his future rides entirely on the development of his bat.

BlessyouBoys ranked Vasquez as the #3 prospect in the Tiger's system in their midseason update earlier this month:
I had the privilege of seeing Danry Vasquez, while I sat on the opening series of the Whitecaps season. I came away not loving him, to be completely honest. He was bad in the field, lacked some game awareness, and looked a bit lost at the plate. However, it was really cold, and he's 19. I went in with expectations too high, and that was my fault. Therefore, it's easy to take that original series with a grain of salt. After seeing him again, and reevaluating, I came to the conclusion that Vasquez is an extremely intriguing prospect, if nothing else. He's wirey at 6'3 170, and is already relegated to a corner spot in the OF. But oh man, that swing is so, so sweet. He keeps the bat flat through the hitting zone for a really long time, especially for a teenager. Danry has also got a nice approach at the plate, evidenced by the 7.5% walk rate and only a 14% K rate (which is awesome).
Vasquez was given a 1.2 million dollar bonus out of Venezuela 3 years ago. The highest in recent memory for a Tigers prospect. He was good, but not great in the GCL in 2011, and the Tigers decided to be aggressive, as they often are, and assigned him to WMI to start last year as an 18 year old. Vasquez was overmatched, and hit .162/.218/.222, but held his own in the New York Penn college league after a demotion. This year, in his second go around in the Midwest League, Vasquez is sporting a .282/.335/.389 line, good for a .724 OPS. Overall, not huge numbers, but there are plenty of encouraging signs that Vasquez could be an every day player.
Danry is one of the few Tigers prospects with the potential to be a "role 6" player. By that, I mean an above average major leaguer. His slender frame and sweet swing makes it easy for me to project some power when his body fills out, and he has already shown signs of hitting for average. Like I said before, his fielding needs work, but he's got some athletic ability, and consistent reps in left field will only help that cause. At his absolute ceiling, I could see Vasquez hitting around .280 with somewhere in the neighborhood of 20 bombs and 35+ doubles. He's an incredibly long way away from doing that at the major league level, but has got the tools to get there.

John Sickels had Vasquez rated a B- and the #5 prospect in the Tiger's system entering the year:
Like Garcia, he's handicapped by poor plate discipline, but has terrific bat speed and is very young at age 19 in January. It will be interesting to see how aggressive the Tigers are about promoting him.

Monday, July 29, 2013

Why The PTBNL In The Veras-Vasquez Deal Does Not Necessarily Equal A 2012 Draftee

In case you missed it, earlier today the Astros completed a 2-1 swap trading closer Jose Veras for OF prospect Danry Vasquez and a player to be named later (PTBNL).  I've already read fans speculate that this may mean that the PTBNL is a 2012 draftee.  While that could be the case, under new CBA, for the first time, virtually all of last year's draftees are already eligible to be traded at the July trade deadline. 

In previous years, including 2012, if you wanted to trade for a prospect that originally signed last August, you had to include him as a PTBNL and wait until the one year anniversary of the date he signed.  Think the Drew Pomeranz trade to Colorado in 2011, or the Astros' trade for D'andre Toney last year.  Teams still have to wait a year after a player signs, but, with the draft signing deadline moved up to mid-July, virtually all of last year players are already eligible to be traded. 

The PTBNL still may be a 2012 draftee, but he likely won't be a PTBNL because of being a 2012 draftee.

Potential Trade Targets: Baltimore Orioles

For the second year in row Baltimore is looking to prove the naysayers wrong by advancing to the playoffs.  Dismissed by many as a fluke last year, the Orioles are looking like legitimate contenders this go round.  First baseman, Chris Davis, is having a breakout MVP age 27 campaign and the team as whole is in the 2nd wildcard spot at 58-47 with a +35 run differential.  While Baltimore has already made trades to add at starter and closer, rumors still have them as a potential landing spot for Norris and/or Bedard.

The Orioles have a top heavy farm system lead by former first round picks Kevin Gausman and Dylan Bundy.  Former international signees, Eduardo Rodriguez and Jonathan Schoop, are back end top 100 type prospects, but after that the system thins out noticeably.

TOP TRADEABLE PROSPECTS

Eduardo Rodriguez LHP

Rodriguez has made steady improvement since signing for $175,000 out of Venezuela in 2010.  Ranked the 5th best prospect in the system by Baseball America prior to the season, the lefthander currently checks in as seventh best left-handed pitching prospect and  #93 overall in Jonathan Mayo's current top 100.  Rodriguez has a two-seam fastball that sits in the low 90s and a slider and changeup that are inconsistent, but have the potential to be average to plus.  The entire package grades out as someone who has a reasonable upside of a 3/4 starter.  He's in double-A, but is likely at least a year away from breaking into the majors.  The fact that he's left-handed might be attractive to the Astros, as it is, by-far, the biggest weakness in their system.  He's too rich for a Bedard deal, but fits the profile of someone who could headline a Norris deal.

YearAgeTmLevWLERAGIPHRERHRBBSOH/9HR/9BB/9SO/9
201017Orioles 1FRk342.331265.2492617028626.70.03.88.5
2011182 TeamsRk-A-112.221248.2342012118506.30.23.39.2
201118OriolesRk111.811144.228179017465.60.03.49.3
201118AberdeenA-006.7514.063311413.52.22.29.0
201219DelmarvaA573.7022107.01035644430738.70.32.56.1
2013202 TeamsA+-AA763.1918107.1944738637887.90.53.17.4
201320FrederickA+642.851485.1783627425668.20.42.67.0
201320BowieAA124.50422.0161111212226.50.84.99.0
4 Seasons16183.0464328.2280149111111132737.70.33.17.5
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 7/28/2013.


Jonathan Schoop 2B/SS

Schoop's been on the prospect radar for few years now.  Originally signed out of Curacao in 2008, Schoop cracked Baseball America's top 100 in 2012 ranking at #82.  Moved off of shortstop in deference to Manny Machado when they both were coming up on the same team, Schoop has held his own as he's been aggressively moved up the system.  His double and triple A slash lines aren't going to turn anyone's heads, but it's important note just how young he's been at each level. While he might be able to play shortstop in the big leagues in a pinch, some think his future home might be at 2nd or 3rd base.  Moving him out of the middle infield might be a better fit defensively, but would put a lot more pressure on his bat. 

Schoop is arguably the 3rd best prospect in the system and could be attractive trade bait to a team that needs a middle infield prospect.  However, with Altuve signing a long term deal at 2nd; Villar getting a shot at shortstop; and Correa, Deshields, and Fontana on the farm, I'm not sure where he would fit in the Astros' plans.  Perhaps if they think the glove and bat will play at 3rd, he could be the type of piece that gets moved for Norris.

YearAgeTmLevPARH2B3BHRRBISBBBSOBAOBPSLGOPS
200917OriolesFRk284285973035112439.239.320.291.612
2010183 TeamsRk-A+240326218153512025.290.350.453.803
201018BluefieldRk148164211121611214.316.372.459.831
201018OriolesRk70111540316077.250.329.467.795
201018FrederickA+22553003014.238.273.381.654
2011192 TeamsA+-A567821482451371124276.290.349.432.781
201119DelmarvaA238456712383462032.316.376.514.890
201119FrederickA+329378112253762244.271.329.375.704
201220BowieAA555681192411456550103.245.324.386.710
2013213 TeamsAAA-Rk-A-19324519083511635.295.363.486.848
201321OriolesRk32992039066.360.469.8001.269
201321AberdeenA-15381028011.571.6001.0711.671
201321NorfolkAAA1461234603181928.254.315.366.681
5 Seasons183923443982104023230152278.269.339.406.744
Rk (2 seasons)Rk250366617184112527.303.372.500.872
A+ (2 seasons)A+351428615254062348.269.326.375.701
A (1 season)A238456712383462032.316.376.514.890
AA (1 season)AA555681192411456550103.245.324.386.710
FRk (1 season)FRk284285973035112439.239.320.291.612
A- (1 season)A-15381028011.571.6001.0711.671
AAA (1 season)AAA1461234603181928.254.315.366.681
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 7/28/2013.